Joplin Misses the Mark of Nursing Deer Ethics

A nursing white-tailed fawn feeds beneath the protective canopy of an oak tree, surrounded by tall grasses and filtered sunlight. The doe stands alert, her body angled to shield her offspring, while the fawn still speckled with white leans in close, drawing warmth and nourishment. This quiet moment of connection reflects the seasonal vulnerability of late-born fawns in Joplin Missouri, where urban hunting ordinances offer no protection for nursing deer or fawn.

As of 2025, Joplin’s urban hunting ordinance permits bow hunting within city limits during the fall and early winter months. But this regulation fails to address a crucial ethical and biological concern: the taking of nursing does.

City of Joplin Bow Hunting Ordinance Endangers 

Nursing Deer and Late-Season Fawns

While technically allowed under Missouri’s broader hunting laws, targeting a nursing doe especially one with late-season fawns born in August is not ethically sound. It directly contradicts wildlife survival data and undermines responsible conservation efforts. 

The Missouri Department of Conservation and regional wildlife experts have repeatedly emphasized that late-born fawns are biologically underdeveloped and unlikely to survive winter without maternal care. By allowing hunters to target does indiscriminately, the ordinance risks orphaning vulnerable fawns and destabilizing local deer populations.

I live in southwest Joplin, adjacent to 29 acres of privately owned, heavily wooded land that has long served as sanctuary for a small deer herd. This season, I’ve observed three does, two first-season bucks, and three late-season fawns born in August. The herd was larger last year but many did not survive the winter. Projectiles were heard in the woods at night, and the loss was palpable.

Late-Season Fawns and the Quiet Proof of Timing

These images were taken in southwest Joplin, where a small deer herd continues to shelter near my home. The nursing doe and her late-season fawns just 2 to 3 weeks old move quietly through the underbrush, still fragile, still learning. You’ll notice the spent blooms of the “naked lady” lilies in the background, a subtle but unmistakable marker of the season’s shift. Their fading petals confirm what the wildlife already knows: it’s late summer, and these fawns are just beginning. 

  

Late-Season Fawns: Vulnerable and Still Learning

The does in southwest Joplin are still nursing fawns born in August late-season arrivals who remain biologically behind their spring-born counterparts. These younger fawns often lack the body mass, fat reserves, and foraging experience needed to survive Missouri’s harsh winter conditions.

Removing a nursing doe this late in the season leaves these fawns without the guidance and protection they still depend on, despite city officials’ claims that they are “independent.” Even if a fawn is technically weaned, its survival hinges on learned behaviors: identifying food sources, avoiding predators, and navigating territory. These skills aren’t instinctive they’re taught. And when a mother is taken too soon, that learning curve is abruptly severed. 

Joplin’s Urban Hunting Ordinance: A Harvest Without Safeguards

Joplin’s urban hunting ordinance passed as Ordinance 2025-083 permits bow hunting of deer within city limits during Missouri’s archery season (September 15–January 15). Hunters must be at least 16 years old, possess all required state permits, and carry written permission from landowners of private parcels one acre or larger. Those under 18 must be accompanied by a licensed adult with hunter education certification. All hunting must be conducted from a stand at least 10 feet off the ground.

However, the ordinance includes no seasonal or ethical exemptions for nursing does, late-born fawns, or first-season young bucks. As written, it permits the harvest of any deer within city limits regardless of age, dependency, or biological vulnerability. There is no stated limit on the number of deer a hunter may take under city rules, deferring instead to state regulations, which allow multiple tags depending on permit type and season.

This means bow hunters, age 16 and up, are legally allowed to target mature bucks, newly weaned fawns, and does still actively nursing August-born offspring. Even teen hunters are eligible, provided they meet basic permit requirements and are accompanied by a licensed adult. The ordinance reads as a harvest of all deer not a selective or humane management plan. And that omission carries real consequences for wildlife still learning to survive.

 Legal Doesn’t Mean Ethical: What Missouri Conservation Actually Says

While Joplin’s urban hunting ordinance may technically comply with Missouri law, it clearly contradicts the ethical standards and wildlife stewardship principles promoted by the Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) and MU Extension.

 No Exemptions for Nursing Does or Fawns
The ordinance permits the harvest of any deer mature bucks, first-season young bucks, nursing does, and late-season fawns with no seasonal safeguards or ethical restraint. Hunters age 16 and up are legally allowed to participate, including teens accompanied by a licensed adult.

 MDC’s Hunter Ethics Guidance
The MDC urges hunters to “respect the land and all wildlife” and to “make every effort to retrieve and use all game.” Ethical hunting includes considering the ripple effects of harvesting a nursing doe especially when dependent fawns are still learning to survive.
➤ Read MDC’s Hunter Ethics page

 MU Extension on Population Health
According to MU Extension’s white-tailed deer management guides, deer populations are shaped by habitat, hunting pressure, and seasonal conditions. Removing does with dependent fawns can skew herd dynamics and reduce recruitment rates undermining long-term viability.
➤ Explore MU Extension’s deer management resources

---

 Supporting Resources

• Hunter Ethics – Missouri Department of Conservation
• Ecology and Management of White-Tailed Deer in Missouri – MU Extension
• Wildlife Control Guidelines – MDC

.No Exemptions: Joplin’s Bow Hunting Ordinance Targets All Deer

Joplin’s urban hunting ordinance includes no seasonal or ethical exemptions for nursing does, late-born fawns, or first-season young bucks. As written, it permits the harvest of any deer within city limits regardless of age, dependency, or biological vulnerability. This means bow hunters, age 16 and up, are legally allowed to target mature bucks, newly weaned fawns, and does still actively nursing August-born offspring. Even teen hunters are eligible, provided they meet basic permit requirements and are accompanied by a licensed adult. The ordinance reads as a harvest of all deer not a selective or humane management plan. And that omission carries real consequences for wildlife still learning to survive.

 Author's  Note / Disclaimer
This article is intended for educational and advocacy purposes only. It reflects the author's personal perspective on urban wildlife management and public safety. No part of this content promotes illegal activity, violence, or harm toward animals or individuals. All references to local ordinances, safety concerns, and wildlife behavior are based on publicly available information and lived experience. Readers are encouraged to consult official city resources and conservation experts for guidance.

Other articles you may like

Controlled Hunt vs Chaos What Joplin Could Have Done Instead 

The Ethics of Youth BowHunting in Urban Zones

The Hunters Left Behind:What Joplin’s Bow Hunting Ordinance Missed

Joplin’s Urban Deer Hunting Ordinance Will Change Autumn 2025 Forever: What Residents Need to Know

 

As bow hunting expands into Joplin’s neighborhoods, residents brace for an autumn unlike any other. Here’s what the 2025 ordinance means for wildlife, safety, and community care.

 

This fall, as the leaves turn and the air grows crisp, a quiet shift will settle over our community. The woods that once welcomed children’s laughter and family hikes where acorns were gathered, wildlife watched, and seasonal rituals played out will no longer be a safe haven. A recent change to the city council’s hunting ordinance has altered access to these familiar trails, and for many, this year’s autumn won’t look or feel the same.

I read with concern the recent decision by the Joplin City Council to approve bow hunting of deer within city limits. While I understand the motivations unfenced backyards, property damage, rising deer populations, vehicle collisions on roads lacking “deer crossing” signage, and fears around chronic wasting disease I believe this ordinance misses the mark.

We live in a region where deer have always belonged. They were here long before subdivisions, sidewalks, and manicured lawns. When residents choose to live near wooded areas, part of that choice involves coexisting with wildlife. It’s not the deer who are encroaching on us it’s the other way around.

Instead of responding with lethal force, we should explore non-lethal alternatives:  Improved fencing and deterrents.  Public education on wildlife coexistence.  Enforcement of feeding bans to prevent habituation.

Deer aren’t pests. They’re survivors, navigating shrinking habitats and disrupted migration paths. Hunting them simply for being present feels inhumane especially when late-season does are still nursing fawns. These vulnerable family units should never be targets.

 Safety Concerns When Hunting in the City

Urban woods are shared spaces, not shooting ranges. Protect families, wildlife, and vulnerable neighbors.

 Safety and Ethics in Residential Zones

Some council members raised safety concerns, and rightly so. Allowing arrows to fly in residential areas introduces risks we may not be prepared to manage. During fall months, families and children walk wooded trails to admire foliage. With a growing homeless population, wooded areas may also serve as refuge. The last thing anyone needs is to be struck by a stray arrow.

And what of interpretation? My neighbor has been feeding deer for weeks and plans to hunt on his property come September 15th. His land borders mine just 20 feet from my home. Feeding deer is illegal under Missouri law, and hunting in densely populated residential zones is reckless at best. Yet he misinterpreted the Joplin hunting ordinance.  He seems to think it gives him permission.

Will people jump out of cars to pursue deer crossing the road? Will poachers assume firearms are fair game? These questions were never addressed when the City of Joplin approved this ordinance.

You can read the full ordinance and registration requirements on the City of Joplin’s official website.

A Better Way Forward

If deer populations truly require management, a controlled hunt would have been more responsible:  A short, supervised weekend event led by animal control and conservation officers.  Permits checked and safety protocols enforced. Limited to mature 4-point bucks only no does, fawns, or young bucks.

This could have helped balance population control. Instead, we’re now facing a months-long open season from September through January that feels like a free-for-all for bow hunters. Permits and landowner permission are technically required, but who’s actually checking those letters?

From what I’ve seen on social media, many hunters seem to assume that any wooded land in Joplin is fair game. They rarely mention landowner consent, and the lines between public and private property are getting dangerously blurred.

Let’s rethink what it means to live alongside wildlife. Let’s choose coexistence over convenience, and compassion over control. 

Similar articles   

Controlled Hunt vs Chaos What Joplin Could Have Done

Joplin Misses the Mark of Late Season Fawn and Nursing Doe 

Urban Bow Hunting in Joplin: A Cautionary Tale from the City Woods

No Signs, No Safety: What Deer Collisions Reveal About Joplin’s Wildlife Crisis

The Myth of High-Pressure Deer Zones in Joplin  

Fear Over Facts: Why Joplin’s Deer Ordinance Misrepresents Lyme Disease 

Urban Deer in Joplin: What’s Really Driving the City Bow Hunting Ordinance

 Author's  Note / Disclaimer
This article is intended for educational and advocacy purposes only. It reflects the author's personal perspective on urban wildlife management and public safety. No part of this content promotes illegal activity, violence, or harm toward animals or individuals. All references to local ordinances, safety concerns, and wildlife behavior are based on publicly available information and lived experience. Readers are encouraged to consult official city resources and conservation experts for guidance.