Sunday, September 7, 2025

This Fall, Don’t Blame the Deer for Ticks in Joplin, MO

  

As autumn settles over Joplin, the woods come alive with color, and the leaf litter crunches underfoot. It’s the season of hikes, backyard bonfires, and long walks through tree-lined trails. But if you find a tick after brushing past fallen leaves or tangled debris, don’t rush to blame the deer.


 

Debunking the Lyme Disease Excuse: Why Joplin’s Urban Deer Harvest Doesn’t Hold Up

When the Joplin City Council approved the urban deer harvest ordinance, one of their loudest justifications was public health: reducing the risk of Lyme disease. But here’s the truth Joplin has no confirmed cases of Lyme disease. Not now, not in the past 20 years. According to 101 The Eagle’s regional report, the only Missouri counties with documented Lyme disease are Lewis, Clark, and Pike all in the northeastern corner of the state, far from Joplin.

So why are we killing deer in the name of a disease that doesn’t exist here?



The Science They Ignored

Let’s break down the biology:

Deer do not carry Lyme disease. They are not competent reservoirs for Borrelia burgdorferi, the bacterium that causes Lyme. Biology Insights explains this clearly deer may host ticks, but they do not infect them.

Ticks don’t get infected from deer. They get infected from small mammals like mice and shrews.

Deer don’t infect humans. Lyme disease is transmitted through the bite of an infected tick not through deer contact.

In fact, deer are more like highways for ticks than disease factories. Adult ticks feed and mate on deer, yes but deer don’t pass the bacteria to ticks, and they don’t show symptoms of Lyme disease themselves. Forbes also breaks this down, showing how deer tolerate the bacteria without becoming sick or infectious.



🧼 Grooming and Tick Removal

Here’s something else the ordinance ignores: deer groom each other. They remove ticks through mutual grooming. Natural behavior helps reduce tick loads without human intervention. And even if a tick drops off a deer, the odds of it crawling across a yard and biting a human are slim.

Real Risk Comes from Rodents

If Joplin officials were serious about Lyme disease prevention, they’d focus on:

Rodent control, since mice and chipmunks are the true reservoirs of Lyme

Public education on tick checks and repellents

Habitat management, not herd destruction

Instead, they’ve weaponized a misunderstood disease to justify a controversial ordinance.

 What’s Really Going On?

Let’s call it what it is: a public relations strategy, not a public health measure. By invoking Lyme disease, the city cloaks its deer culling in the language of safety and science without the data to back it up.

This isn’t just misleading. It’s dangerous. It erodes public trust, misinforms residents, and threatens the integrity of Joplin’s wildlife advocacy.

Here’s a strong, emotionally grounded disclaimer that honors your long-term stewardship and positions your voice with authority and clarity:

 Author’s Disclaimer: A Lifetime of Observation

Since 2004, I have been actively observing, photographing, and documenting a small sanctuary herd of whitetail deer in southwest Joplin, Missouri. This is not casual wildlife watching it is a longitudinal study shaped by daily patterns, seasonal shifts, and over two decades of firsthand data.

I was asked in 2010 by Martin at Animal Control to monitor this herd, let him know if it needed to be culled and while he may have retired, I never stopped watching. What began as a civic duty has become a once-in-a-lifetime study. I have witnessed behaviors, herd dynamics, and ecological interactions that few others have ever seen let alone recorded.

From grooming rituals and fawn development to sanctuary migration and urban adaptation, my documentation reflects a depth of understanding that qualifies me, without hesitation, as an expert in this specific herd and its habitat. These deer are not just subjects they are part of a living archive that continues to teach, challenge, and inspire.

Any claims made in this article are grounded in direct observation, photographic evidence, and years of pattern-based research.

No comments: